![]() Having pulled on this thread I found that the document referred to by Meadow’s is 98 percent redacted, and what is visible doesn’t support any of his claims that Steele was a “political partisan” rather than someone who was legitimately and seriously concerned that Trump may have been essentially a fully cultivated asset of Vladamir Putin’s. Meadows’ statement came in response to a federal document recently unveiled by a Citizens United lawsuit - an email from Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Kathleen Kavalec, who met with Steele in October 2016 and recounted his desire to spread the lurid allegations of his since-debunked dossier on then-candidate Donald Trump. “The fact that Christopher Steele and his partisan research document were treated in any way seriously by our Intelligence Community leaders amounts to malpractice.” “fficials at the FBI and (Department of Justice) DOJ were well aware the dossier was a lie - from very early on in the process all the way to when they made the conscious decision to include it in a FISA application,” Meadows said Tuesday in a statement to The Hill’s John Solomon. ![]() ![]() Mark Meadows (who claims the “FBI knew the Steele dossier was a lie” long before they “spied on the Trump campaign”) would like it that way. ![]() Perhaps that’s because some people have already made up their minds, and because some other people, like Rep. It is a question that has had the country riveted for the the past two-and-a-half years: Just how many allegations within the so-called “Steele dossier” have proven accurate? How much of it is true? How much of it has been debunked?įor some reason, it doesn’t seem like many people have even attempted to find that answer, even after we’ve received the redacted version of the Mueller report. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |